Tyranny of numbers

Elections in times of economic crisis

Posted in General, Inequality, Poverty by Djavad on March 13, 2016

In a post that I published earlier this week on the Brookings blog, Future Development, I argued that because Iran’s February 26 parliamentary elections took place at an economically inopportune time the success of the moderate candidates is all the more significant.  In my last post here, written a couple days before the election, I had presented some evidence for the poor state of the economy — loss of industrial jobs and falling living standards since Rouhani’s election in June 2013.  In this post I expand the discussion of living standards, poverty, and inequality in recent years.

In my previous post I presented evidence from the 1393 (2014/15) Household Expenditure and Incomes Surveys (HEIS) showing that the economy had deteriorated in the first 1.5 years of Rouhani, and from Labor Force Surveys showing that in the summer 2015 there were nearly 300,000 fewer industrial jobs than the summer of 2013 (the service sector picked up enough jobs in the meantime to maintain the overall level of employment).

It turns out that I am not nearly as pessimistic as Rouhani’s own senior vice president, Eshaq Jahangiri, who claimed (link in Persian) that this year is “the worst since the revolution.” It was the worst in a decade, but by no means the worst since the revolution.   The absolute worst post-revolution year was 1987, the year before the war with Iraq ended (see the graph here).  This year’s GDP per capita is in fact more than five times it was in 1987 (seven if you take the PWT series).

Back to more recent years.  The most up-to-date data on economic welfare is from the Statistical Center of Iran (SCI), which publishes annually a comprehensive survey of household expenditures and incomes.  Here is what I calculate from the past four years of the HEIS data files:



Real expenditures per person per day, 2014/15 rials

Real per capita expenditures fell nationally starting in 2011, the first Iranian year (2011/12) after international sanctions tightened starting in July 2011.  Rural expenditures started to fall a year later and, as with expenditures in urban areas (excluding Tehran), continued to fall into 2014/15, more than a year after the Rouhani administration had taken charge.

Interestingly, Tehran’s households appear to have seen a reversal of this trend during his first year.  As I mentioned in the Brooking piece, this reversal may have helped the moderate candidates in Tehran’s elections.  And of course it was Tehran’s results that dominated the election news, hence a potentially overoptimistic take on the moderates’ success.

Unsurprisingly, in 2014/15, the poverty rate shot up in rural areas and increased noticeably in urban areas, while it fell in Tehran.  The estimates of the poverty rates in this table  use poverty lines for rural and urban areas by province that average to about $5 per person per day (PPP) in 2014/15.

It is important to note also the decline in poverty rates in rural areas during 2010-2012, despite falling average expenditures nationally (as noted in the last column of the table above), which is no doubt a result of cash transfers that started in 2011/12.

poverty rates2010-2014

Poverty rates (percent of population below the poverty line)

As one would expect, inequality also increased last year, as an array of inequality indices listed in the table below clearly show.  The mention the most familiar measure, the Gini index that had declined from 41.5 percent in 2010/11 to 37.4 percent in 2013/14, went back up to 38.8 in 2014/15.  The same trend is seen in the ratio of expenditures of the 90th to the 10th percentile and the General Entropy (GE) indices in the table.



Inequality of per capita expenditures, various measures

There has been little discussion of these trends in poverty and inequality the Iranian press, perhaps because they imply that the Ahmadinejad administration was pro-poor, which is not a cool thing to say in polite company.  An article in the popular business weakly Tejarat Farda (issue #170, p. 89) dismissed the evidence of declining inequality during Ahmadinejad years because the Lorenz curve (on which the Gini index is based) is a “theoretical concept” that lacks empirical validity!

Lowering poverty and inequality by distributing cash is not an accomplishment; the real deal is to generate inclusive growth and create jobs.  Ahmadinejad did not neither.

The ball is now in Rouhani’s court, not just to bring about economic growth but of the inclusive and pro-poor type.  So far the available evidence is not in his favor.   It is, of course, too early to decide if he can deliver the real deal and we should be willing another 2-3 years.

But we need to make sure that the economy is on the right track.  To do so we need to use the evidence that become available carefully and honestly, and not be afraid that it may tell us what we do not want to hear.  Iran’s Central Bank could start on this worthy cause by publishing economic growth data on which it is several years behind.


7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] بود، در دو سال ابتدایی دولت یازدهم تا نزدیک ۳.۹ افزایش یافته است که حکایت از عمیق‌تر شده بی‌عدالتی در توزیع درآمد در […]

  2. Ali said, on March 28, 2016 at 9:22 pm

    Thank you for your commentary. Actually I tried to find the expenditure statistics in both CBI and SCI websites for provinces(because I wanted to do a similar analysis as you did for some special provinces like Khorasan Razavi where conservatives wone the elections), but I couldn’t find anything. Is it possible for you to put the links, where you found the data, here?

    • Djavad said, on March 29, 2016 at 5:06 am

      The link to the SCI study of inequality is in my latest post. You can find the link to SCI micro data in an earlier post with “micro data” in the title.

  3. Hamed said, on March 14, 2016 at 5:41 am

    What would the decline in poverty as well as inequality and then their sharp increase imly? That “cash transfer” had had a positive effect at first, filling tbe gap for the very poor, and then by losing jobs and negative growth rate people (even in rural areas) got worse off?

    • Djavad said, on March 29, 2016 at 5:08 am

      I think the reversal shows the waning effect of the transfers as well as the fact that in 2014 energy prices increased without any increase in cash transfers, which affected the poor adversely. See also my latest post for the trends in poverty.

  4. Afsaneh said, on March 14, 2016 at 12:42 am

    Hi, I guess what might be missing here is the expectation.
    Although in absense of sentiment indicators it is hard to judge the impact of expectations on either political or economic choices of Iranian, it’s unreasonable to assume that the public in Iran is associating the glory of the neuclear deal with Rouhani’s administration (ignoring the fact that there was as much an economical urgency to end the encompass with west as a political one). Scoring in international scene, the administration, mainly representing the moderate party, created some hope and further expectations that moderate’s in office can (rather magically) solve long term economic problems in due time.
    That, I’m worried, is the public setting itself for disappointment, if low oil prices and lingering effects of sanctions continue to drag on the economy.

    • Djavad said, on March 29, 2016 at 5:12 am

      I share your concern. Sanctions are dragging on, mainly those imposed by the US and oil prices do not show any sign of a significant recovery. The Iranian public does have low patience with its politicians.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: