Tyranny of numbers

Will Iran’s inflation rebound?

Posted in General by Djavad on April 6, 2014

So far the most visible improvement in the economy since Rouhani administration took office last August has been lower inflation.   Last Bahman (Iranian month ending on February 20, 2014)  the Consumer Price Index (published by the Central Bank) showed virtually no increase; the same month a year earlier it had jumped by 5.3%.  During the last three months (December 21 to February 20), the CPI rose by only 1.6%, compared to 7.2% a year ago.  What appears to be more stubborn is the real economy — output and employment that determine living standards.

Not everyone agrees that inflation has been falling fast.  Financial Times wrote of only  “a slight drop in the inflation rate from 39 per cent to 36.7 per cent since he took office.” But this is an error that journalists bent on sounding dramatic always make.  If you are reporting on the changes in inflation for only one year you cannot use annual rates; you need to use the monthly rate at which prices increase, a measure that been falling for about a year (see graphs here or here).

But this trend is unlikely to continue.  Inflation is poised to increase as energy and bread prices are set to rise early as part of a plan agreed with the Parliament, known as the Phase 2 of the subsidy reform program.   The price of natural gas was quietly raised before Nowruz, by 20% for residential and 30% for commercial users, and electricity rates have just gone up by 24%.   The Iranian press is reporting gasoline is to effectively double in price, to 10,00 rials per liter, up from 4000 and 7000 rials per liter for rationed and free purchase.

It is hard to imagine that these price increases will leave inflation unchanged, at less than one percent per month (about 15% per year).  Inflation got to be that low because energy prices have been fro zen for the past three years and, more importantly, Rouhani slashed spending for 1392 and restrained the growth of money supply.

While tight fiscal policy will probably continue, monetary policy will have to ease somewhat to accommodate the rise in energy prices.  This is unavoidable because major relative prices changes need some inflation to work their way through the economy.  This is because wages and therefore most prices are rigid downward.  An interesting article in Fars News by Pesaran and Salehi Esfahani — much better macroeconomists than I — stated that energy prices can in principle increase without inflation: “if aggregate demand remains constant, rising nominal energy prices will be accompanied by falling other prices.”  Much as I like to think like that, in believe the idea of other prices falling to make relative price change happen is a Friedmanite fantasy.  Energy intensive producers will raise their prices right after the government raises energy prices, which will put pressure on the monetary authorities to expand credit or print money, which will raise the general price level.  If the Central Bank attempts to fight this type of inflation it will impose an unnecessary high cost on the nation in terms of output and employment, which is why it will not do so.

The good thing about Iran’s inflationary process is that the link between prices and wages is not direct — there are no unions and wages abs salaries are not indexed.  This was the main reason why inflation in Latin America was self reinforcing.  In Iran, unless the Central Bank continues to pump money, beyond what is needed to help relative prices adjust.  This means that any inflation generated by the current round of energy price increases need not last beyond 1393.

For the current year, the government predicts an inflation of 20-25%, which is much more than is needed to accommodate a similar increase in energy prices.  There is an underlying inflation rate of 10-15% linked to rising oil revenues and salary increases for 1393 that would put inflation in 1393 in the ball park of the government forecast.

It is important to note that, except for gasoline, the energy prices so far reported by the press, ranging between 20-30 percent, do not count as subsidy reform.  If the general prices level increases by 20-25 percent in the coming 12 months, then very little of the subsidy accumulated in the last three years will be eliminated.  The real implementation of the Phase 2 of the subsidy reform is therefore a long way off.



5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. cash for junk car long island said, on September 2, 2015 at 5:28 pm

    Great post. I have to ask you iff you did tthe research oon thhis topic or did you hire someonee else to research it for you?
    I assk tthis because this post is detailed and to do this you have to have good research skills.

  2. […] recent welcome slowdown of inflation in Iran, like its devastating acceleration four years ago, has something to do […]

  3. Sam said, on May 7, 2014 at 4:15 am

    What effect would the ultimate easing of sanctions have on Iran’s economy ? Would the renewed flow of petro dollars into Iran’s economy cause significant inflation ?

    Also what effect would the billions of unpaid bank loans have on the economy ? Are these investors just waiting for more stable economic conditions ?

  4. Yaser Mollaei said, on April 9, 2014 at 2:30 pm

    Dear Dr. Javad

    we have to keep in mind the impact of decease in exchange rate which happened in Rouhani administration.
    working on monthly inflation rate, I captured an impressive correlation between monthly inflation rate and monthly changes in exchange rate at least in last 24 months. me and my colleagues was thinking and debating about the mechanism of such fast reflection of exchange rate volatility on inflation rate and intuitively we come about the mechanism that you mentioned. Market forces central banker to adjust money supply with new set of relative prices which have shaped in the minds of market players due to new leading price.
    Reading your article impressed me! actually increase in fuel prices would have such an effect this year.
    Would you please introduce a reference, which explains this argument formally?

  5. Ajax Lessome said, on April 7, 2014 at 10:36 pm

    We should be more concerned about Iran obtaining Nukes.The Iranian government has long pursued full nuclear capabilities, and despite offering some major concessions to the international community, has refused to give up control of the full nuclear fuel cycle. If the current Joint Plan of Action (JPA) does not succeed in producing a conclusive agreement by July 20, the United States and its allies will be faced with the possibility that Iran will become a nuclear power. In fact, some commentators believe that Iran acquiring nuclear weapons is actually an outcome which should be palatable for the United States. However, this viewpoint ignores the implications for nuclear proliferation both in the Middle East and the world. It is important that the United States makes all possible effort to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: